A consolidation of data?

So what does MiFID II finally say about the consolidated tape? If you remember the story so far, a number of Consolidated Tape Providers, or CTPs – each authorised to operate the data reporting services – are supposed to compete to provide said tape. And if you ever wondered what the collective noun for a group of CTPs is, it appears to be ‘an authorisation’. These CTPs will be required to consolidate post-trade equities data (and later non-equities data) from all the APAs (Authorised Publication Arrangements) and trading venues and “…consolidate it into a continuous electronic data stream and make the information available to the public as close to real time as is technically possible, on a reasonable commercial basis.”

The introduction of “all” in the latest text caught my eye. It suggests that each CTP will be covering the entire market of post-trade data, rather than fostering standardisation across CTPs that would consolidate data from a subset of APAs and venues. Mind you, Article 67 alludes to aggregation of data published by different CTPs which kind of contradicts the ‘all’.

So the consolidated tape is indeed coming with MiFID II and all that fragmented data will be joined up again to provide a consolidated view of trade transparency. Just how the commercials will stack up, and how reasonable the cost of usage rights to that data will be, are still for the ESMA working groups to fathom. (Would that be a ‘parliament’ or perhaps a ‘cohort’ of working groups?). And if all else fails, MiFID II still makes provision for a public procurement process to establish the tape.

Comments
2 Responses to “A consolidation of data?”
  1. Philip Beevers says:

    I have to admit to not having read the regulations, but given multiple hypothetical commercially-competitive consolidated tapes, what provision is being made for universal, consolidated static instrument data? It strikes me that a single, non-commercial, authoritative and unified source of instrument data is key to creating any sort of competition between consolidated tapes – without this, it’s too hard to swap out one for the other, because the static data is so complex semantically.

    Obviously such a static data source has massive advantages in taking cost and error out of the European trading ecosystem as well, although those advantages aren’t new and haven’t made such a thing appear – yet.

    • Anne says:

      Hi Philip, Thanks for your comment. Within the current MiFID II scope the intention is that CTP competition will take place on the basis of quality of service to clients rather than breadth of data covered. There is however no such provision in MiFID II around consolidation of static instrument data as far as I can see. Perhaps MiFID III?

Leave A Comment

Copyright © 2017 Fidessa group plc. All rights reserved.

The information contained within this website is provided for informational purposes only. Fidessa will use reasonable care to ensure that information is accurate at the time it is made available, and for the duration that it remains on the site. The information may be changed by Fidessa at any time without notice. We also reserve the right to close the website at any time. No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is given on behalf of Fidessa or any of its respective directors, employees, agents, or advisers as to the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained herein or its suitability for any purpose and, save in the case of fraud, all liability for direct, indirect, special, consequential or other loss or damages of whatever kind that may arise from use of the website is hereby excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any decisions you make based on the information in this website are your sole responsibility and information on the website should not be relied upon in connection with any investment decision.

The copyright of this website belongs to Fidessa. All other intellectual property rights are reserved.

Reproduction or redistribution of this information is prohibited except with written permission from Fidessa.