The same, only different?

For MiFID II to work, the industry must have a clear understanding of what constitutes a single instrument. For cash products such as equity or debt this is straightforward, but in derivatives the concept of a single instrument isn’t really appropriate and things quickly get complicated. Looking ahead, it’s feasible that an OTF or SI offers trading in a bilateral cleared... Read More

A brief history of on/off-exchange

Hailed by legislators as the new framework to close loopholes, MiFID II will see OTC trading face new restrictions, most importantly in the form of the Systematic Internaliser (SI) and the new trading obligations. As the fog slowly lifts, it’s becoming apparent that these new restrictions could impact market structure in surprising ways. A more detailed analysis shows that... Read More

Return of the concentration rule

A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away… It is a period of calm, with primary exchanges enjoying relatively little competition thanks to concentration rules enforced in many EU countries requiring all equity business to be conducted on exchange. The arrival of a new disruptor, in the form of MiFID I, is about to turn their lives upside down forever. The blanket ban on concentration... Read More

Hedging swaps with futures: a thing of the past?

As the industry continues to speculate on the trajectory of the swaps market, what’s in store for the final package trade exemption expiring on November 15, 2014, when packages consisting of swaps against futures (so-called ‘invoice spreads’) must be traded on a SEF? The problem with invoice spreads is that the futures component (typically treasury note futures)... Read More

Wanted: Home for OTC trading

With MiFID II’s stated aim to push OTC trading (where appropriate) onto regulated platforms European market structure is undergoing considerable upheaval. As the first round of Level 2 consultation has just finished it’s now time to define what OTC trading is appropriate and where it can be executed. While double volume caps somewhat restrict the use of transparency... Read More

Next Stop St. Petersburg

Back in 2009, in the wake of the financial Armageddon, world leaders pledged in their G20 commitment in Pittsburgh that all standardised OTC derivative contracts should be traded on a platform and centrally cleared by the end of 2012. Fast forward four years and the next G20 summit takes place in St. Petersburg, Russia at the end of this week – the first meeting since the... Read More

Half a job

MiFID, the mother of all European financial regulation, rumbles on and on. The European Commission’s MiFID II consultation in 2011, the Ferber Report in March 2012, and the European Parliament vote in October 2012 were all highly anticipated and widely reported on. But despite the fact that the Council of Ministers has published more than 20 different drafts during the Cyprus... Read More

Stop/start for Dodd-Frank’s swaps rules

The Dodd-Frank Act, nearly three years old this summer, continues its slow, inexorable pace of implementation. In some respects, the financial landscape has changed unequivocally; in others, the final results of change remain to be seen, as the industry awaits additional rulemaking. Most of the current regulatory milestones impact only participants in the OTC swaps markets, but... Read More

Extraterritoriality reality?

Legislators and regulators all around the globe are rushing to meet the G20 commitment of shifting all standardised OTC derivative contracts onto exchanges or electronic trading platforms. Naturally, every country is trying to clean up its own backyard before looking across the fence at its neighbour’s. The disadvantage of this approach is that country-specific rules might... Read More

And the winner is … a compromise!

Whoever said the political processes to formulate MiFID II and MiFIR were complicated and boring? Look at it from the right angle and it can be every bit as exciting as the knockout rounds of a FIFA World Cup tournament. In the World Cup football teams compete against each other and only the winner progresses. The last team remaining in the competition takes home the trophy. Politics,... Read More

Sensible timeframes please!

The final text of EMIR (European Market Infrastructure Regulation) entered into force on 16th August and the next milestone for ESMA, to complete the Level 2 text by the end of September, is fast approaching. ESMA’s consultation on the draft technical standards received over 130 responses before the 5th August deadline. Whilst there is general support for the key aims of EMIR,... Read More

School’s out!

OK, school’s out and the head’s advice was “…don’t do anything silly, and come back refreshed and ready for the new challenges of next year.” The European Parliament is also on its summer break and the next ECON Committee vote on MiFID II is scheduled for 26th September, with a plenary vote on the calendar for 19th  November.  There remains, however, a whole lot of... Read More

Dodd-Frank: Implications of the latest swap definition rule

Following the CFTC’s recent approval of a swap definition lawyers and the OTC derivatives industry are busy digesting the 600 page ruling. In effect, this kicks into motion an October 2012 timeline around the implications of two very significant previously defined rules for the regulation of OTC derivatives: Swaps defined by this rule must be cleared; and Swaps defined... Read More

Liquidity and the regulation of markets

Last week’s TradeTech in London included a talk about liquidity by David Lawton, the FSA’s Acting Director, Markets, during which he discussed all the hot potatoes that MiFID II has to offer.  For a change, this was not another piece of 500 millisecond nonsense but included some sensible and well considered arguments. Here are the highlights of his key points: •  ... Read More

Deciphering the new map

Two key themes – liquidity and risk – always rise to the surface of any discussion around the implementation of regulation for OTC derivatives trading in Europe and North America. A couple of recent articles in The Economist neatly outline both sides of the argument by discussing risk, potentially increasing transaction volumes and strategic business opportunities arising... Read More

Regulation, regulation, regulation!

As market participants are still reeling from the attack on HFT and technological innovation in the latest draft amendments to MiFID II, let’s take a look at the rapporteur Markus Ferber’s draft changes to the proposed MiFIR EU regulation. The biggest change is that the OTF category, previously proposed in an attempt to regulate OTC trading on broker crossing systems, now looks... Read More

Should have gone to Specsavers!

On first reading of the draft report from the rapporteur on MiFID II it is unclear from the wording if the ban on direct electronic access is only in the context of high-frequency trading. Surely this must be the case, otherwise we may as well all pack up now. Additional draft amendments to the MiFID text worthy of note are: •    the timeline is crystallising with the final... Read More

The Rapporteur’s Story

Here’s a taster of what could be coming in the Q1 report from the rapporteur for MiFID II – EU lawmaker wants draft securities law beefed up. Looks like, as we expected, HFT could take the hardest hit and OTFs may be limited to non-equities. Thanks to Tor for spotting this article.  Read More

A butterfly effect in the making

In a recent speech, Andrew Haldane (Executive Director, Bank of England) makes a strong and convincing case that the proposed global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) and the Unique Product Identifier (UPI) will have the largest impact on the financial industry in the current regulatory overhaul. The LEI and UPI are introduced in a recent CPSS IOSCO paper on “OTC derivatives data... Read More

Another kind of movie night

Let’s face it, a meeting of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (European Parliament) regarding MIFID II and EMIR is hardly a topic suitable for a movie night. So I wasn’t really that excited to watch their latest discussions on Monday evening in Strasbourg via the internet. However, after seeing the new MiFID movie poster, I was inclined to tune in and watch some... Read More

Make your mind up!

According to The Trade yesterday the European Parliament (EP) is considering forcing broker crossing networks to become systematic internalisers (SIs) or multilateral trading facilities (MTFs) due to fears of excessive fragmentation. The EP may limit the organised trading facility (OTF) category to non-equity instruments only. Since the October 2011 publication of the MiFID II draft... Read More

MiFID II Digest

While the 10 key takeaways from MiFID II may have given Steve indigestion, we are busy tucking in to the smörgåsbord of recently published MiFID II documents and snacking on all the published articles on the subject. From my reading so far, most looks as expected from the previous version that was leaked in August, with the following worthy of note: Organised Trading Facilities (OTFs)... Read More

How Organised is your Trading Facility?

One of the primary aims of the review of MiFID is to provide more appropriate regulatory coverage for the multitude of different trading facilities and methods of execution that have emerged over the last 4 years. Currently, under MiFID, trading venues or platforms are classed as Regulated Markets (RMs), Multilateral Trading Facilities (MTFs) or Systematic Internalisers (SIs). A... Read More

Copyright © 2017 Fidessa group plc. All rights reserved.

The information contained within this website is provided for informational purposes only. Fidessa will use reasonable care to ensure that information is accurate at the time it is made available, and for the duration that it remains on the site. The information may be changed by Fidessa at any time without notice. We also reserve the right to close the website at any time. No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is given on behalf of Fidessa or any of its respective directors, employees, agents, or advisers as to the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained herein or its suitability for any purpose and, save in the case of fraud, all liability for direct, indirect, special, consequential or other loss or damages of whatever kind that may arise from use of the website is hereby excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law. Any decisions you make based on the information in this website are your sole responsibility and information on the website should not be relied upon in connection with any investment decision.

The copyright of this website belongs to Fidessa. All other intellectual property rights are reserved.

Reproduction or redistribution of this information is prohibited except with written permission from Fidessa.